Rubric

ACADEMIC WEBSITE EVALUATION RUBRIC

(For a Teacher Class Website)

 

Developer’s Name: Rod Pierce DipCE BEng

URL: https://www.mathsisfun.com/

Area/Content of Site: Mathematics

Purpose: Academic review of the website

Description of website: Mathsisfun.com is a free educational website and as its name suggests the content deals with concepts in mathematics. It was developed by Rod Pierce DipCE BEng and is maintained by him with contributions from others. This website teaches mathematical concepts in a fun and easy way to students from Prekindergarten (3 years) to Grade 12 (18 years). It covers Number Theory, Algebra, Geometry, Statistics, Measurement, Consumer Arithmetic, Calculus and Physics. The topics are extensive and comprehensive in material. This website is designed to allow students to learn through problem-solving and project base techniques. The website is also useful to teachers in assisting with activities and materials. 


The evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the usefulness of the website Mathisfun.com for teaching and learning.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

DIMENSION

1

POOR

2

BELOW AVERAGE

3

AVERAGE

4

ABOVE AVERAGE

5

EXCELLENT

Score

Goal

Goal of this website is unclear and confusing

Conflicting themes make site’s goals uncertain

Goal is clear but the site contains some unrelated or distracting elements

Clear purpose and goals; but elements seems unnecessary

Goal and purpose of site is clear with no distracting elements

5

 User Friendliness

Unwelcoming to users

Does not evolve a welcoming message

Welcomes visitors but does not appear friendly

Welcoming and appears friendly

Exciting, welcoming and very user-friendly

5

Design

Poorly organised, contains obvious errors, loads slowly and difficult to read

Organisation is confusing; There are some errors and load slowly

Organisation is acceptable, no obvious errors, load adequately and easy to read

Good organisation, no errors, load quickly and easy to read

Excellent organisation, free of errors, loads quickly and clearly and all elements are easy to read

5

Navigability

 

 

 

 

 

 

Difficult to find and follow site navigation links

Navigation links visible but somewhat confusing

Navigation links clear and readily available

Navigation link clear and logical; sitemap included

Navigation logical and clear; site map and search engine available

5

Authourity

Unclear who is the teacher, and the class the site refers to

Teacher name and contact information included, but insufficient class information

Teacher name and contact information included, and some  class information

Teacher name and contact information included; there is full class information

Teacher provides all necessary information to students, parents and community visitors

5

Content

Content is limited and lack relevance to students and parents

Content appears relevant but quality is limited in student needs

Content is adequate in relevance and quality to meet  student needs

Content is relevant and the quality is sufficient for student needs

Content is on target and provides excellent coverage to meet student needs

5

Dates

No date evident

Sites contains some dates

Site contains both creation and updates information; but there is no date related to class activities

Site contains creation and update information and some dates relating to class activities

Site contains dates for creation, updates and all class activities

3

Links

Few relevant working links

Adequate number of links but many are no longer functional

Sufficient number of links that are all functional

A good variety of useful active links

Links offer connection to a wide variety of excellent sites

5

Handicapped Access

No options available for handicapped

Some pages on the web site offers text-only

Site offers text-only on all pages

Sites offers clear options for handicapped

Site includes handicapped options on all pages and links to support software

1

Total Score

1

 

3

 

35

39

Extracted from myeducation kit- Teaching and Learning with Technology @2011

Name of Participant: Meashel Connell


Total Score:      39/45 * 100 = 86%


Criteria:               100% - 75%       Excellent resource. Highly recommend

                              74% – 65 %       Good resource. Recommend with advice to confirm                                                            with reliable sources

                              64%– 50%         Fairly good resource for ideas

                              Below 50%        Not recommended


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evaluative Summary and Recommendation

Introduction